<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Simple Photo Tips</title>
	<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog</link>
	<description>Photo suggestions for everyone</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Nikon D90 DSLR</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/digital-slr/nikon-d90-dslr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/digital-slr/nikon-d90-dslr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 02:53:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital SLR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/digital-slr/nikon-d90-dslr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a day after Canon announces their newest DSLR prosumer camera (the Canon 50D), Nikon announces their newest DSLR - the Nikon D90. The D90 puts out some impressive specs as well, including quality low light handling, and being the first DSLR to also shoot Hi-Def Video.
The video option has a lot of people talking, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a day after <a href="http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/photo-tips/50d-official-release/">Canon announces their newest DSLR</a> prosumer camera (the Canon 50D), Nikon announces their newest DSLR - the <strong>Nikon D90</strong>. The D90 puts out some impressive specs as well, including quality low light handling, and being the first DSLR to also shoot Hi-Def Video.</p>
<p>The video option has a lot of people talking, both for and against the feature. Some feel that the body shape is not designed for shooting video for long periods of time, and that should be left to a video camera, others can&#8217;t wait to try all of their lenses, especially for wide angle and special telephoto work.</p>
<p>In comparing the specs quickly:</p>
<ul>
<li> the Canon 50D appears to be able to shoot at a twice the ISO film speed (12800 compared to 6400) , and</li>
<li>the Canon 50D has more pixels (15.1 mega pixels compared to 12.3)</li>
<li>the Nikon is said to shoot better in low light conditions (where you generally need the faster film speed), and</li>
<li>the Nikon D90 looks to be a little cheaper ($1299 vs $1399).</li>
</ul>
<p><fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Zemanta</legend></p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://laughingsquid.com/new-nikon-d90-camera-includes-ability-to-shoot-720p-hd-video/">New Nikon D90 Camera, Includes Ability To Shoot 720p HD Video</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.techmeme.com/080827/p4">New Nikon is first SLR to shoot video (Jefferson Graham/USA Today)</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/08/25/yet-another-reason-why-nikons-star-seems-to-be-rising/">Yet another reason why Nikon&#8217;s star seems to be rising</a></li>
</ul>
<p></fieldset></p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px" class="zemanta-pixie"><a href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/6e46cc4b-922d-4ecd-a974-122affdfccfc/" class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta"><img src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=6e46cc4b-922d-4ecd-a974-122affdfccfc" style="border: medium none ; float: right" class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/digital-slr/nikon-d90-dslr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>50D Official Release</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/photo-tips/50d-official-release/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/photo-tips/50d-official-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 12:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/photo-tips/50d-official-release/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via Wikipedia OK it&#8217;s not a rumor anymore, the Canon 50D is coming.  We listed the rumor not long ago, and now you can find the official press release on Canon&#8217;s site.
Just a couple of highlights:

&#8230;&#8221;reduce noise and expand sensitivity up to ISO 12800. The faster processing speed of the camera&#8217;s DIGIC 4 image [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; float: right; display: block"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Canon_EOS_40D_img_1326.jpg"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/48/Canon_EOS_40D_img_1326.jpg/202px-Canon_EOS_40D_img_1326.jpg" alt="Canon EOS 40D" style="border: medium none ; display: block" /></a></span><span class="zemanta-img-attribution" style="margin: 1em 0pt 0pt; display: block">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Canon_EOS_40D_img_1326.jpg">Wikipedia</a> </span>OK it&#8217;s not a rumor anymore, the Canon 50D is coming.  We listed the rumor not long ago, and now you can find the <a href="http://www.usa.canon.com/templatedata/pressrelease/20080826_eos50d.html" target="_blank">official press release</a> on Canon&#8217;s site.</p>
<p>Just a couple of highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li>&#8230;&#8221;reduce noise and expand <strong>sensitivity up to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_speed" title="Film speed" rel="wikipedia" class="zem_slink">ISO</a> 12800</strong>. The faster processing speed of the camera&#8217;s DIGIC 4 image processor contributes to the fast <strong>6.3 frame-per-second (fps) continuous shooting</strong> capability (for bursts of up to 90 Large/Fine JPEGs or 16 RAW images on a UDMA <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CompactFlash" title="CompactFlash" rel="wikipedia" class="zem_slink">CF card</a>) &#8220;&#8230;</li>
<li>&#8220;The EOS 50D <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_single-lens_reflex_camera" title="Digital single-lens reflex camera" rel="wikipedia" class="zem_slink">Digital SLR camera</a> offers multiple levels of noise reduction during high-speed shooting. Users can choose from one of four settings- Standard/Weak/Strong/None - to help reduce digital noise that can result from poor lighting conditions. &#8220;</li>
<li>&#8230;&#8221;Canon&#8217;s enhanced Auto Lighting Optimizer analyzes the brightness of subjects and automatically adjusts dark images so that they appear brighter, perfect for subjects in shade or in backlit situations&#8221;</li>
<li>&#8220;A significant upgrade to the Canon EOS 50D camera is its large, clear <strong>3.0-inch Clear View LCD screen </strong>which features 920,000 dot/VGA resolution, four times the pixel count of the EOS 40D camera&#8217;s screen&#8221;&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>All that and more for an estimated selling price of $1,399.00.</p>
<p><fieldset class="zemanta-related"><legend class="zemanta-related-title">Related articles by Zemanta</legend></p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul">
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/08/26/official-canons-15-1-megapixel-eos-50d-with-digic-4-processing/">Official: Canon&#8217;s 15.1 megapixel EOS 50D with DIGIC 4 processing</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article-ul-li"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/5041734/canon-eos-50d-official-15+megapixel-prosumer-dslr-is-first-with-digic-4-processor">Canon EOS 50D Official: 15-Megapixel Prosumer DSLR Is First With Digic 4 Processor [DSLRs]</a></li>
</ul>
<p></fieldset></p>
<p style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px" class="zemanta-pixie"><a href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/610ed059-d9d8-4a0f-980b-9e7fa1f0a2b9/" class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta"><img src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=610ed059-d9d8-4a0f-980b-9e7fa1f0a2b9" style="border: medium none ; float: right" class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/photo-tips/50d-official-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 50D Rumors</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/canon-50d-rumors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/canon-50d-rumors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 01:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Cameras]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/canon-50d-rumors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been rumored that a new 50D is on the way.  Note 50D, not 5D.  The 50D would continue with the prosumer level set first by the 10D on up through the current 40D.
Note that not all Canon rumors have come true, but it is always nice to think about them.  Here are some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been rumored that a new 50D is on the way.  Note 50D, not 5D.  The 50D would continue with the prosumer level set first by the 10D on up through the current 40D.</p>
<p>Note that not all Canon rumors have come true, but it is always nice to think about them.  Here are some of the eledged specs:</p>
<p>* 15.1 megapixel CMOS sensor<br />
* DIGIC 4<br />
* 1.6x crop<br />
* Dust Reduction<br />
* Auto Brightness Processing<br />
* 95% viewfinder .97 magnification<br />
* 9 point af (All Cross Type)<br />
* 35 meter area equipped with high-precision sensors<br />
* AF Fine Tuning<br />
* ISO 100-12800<br />
* 6.3 fps (high speed) 3fps (low speed)<br />
* Buffer: 16 RAW - 60 JPG - 10 RAW+JPG<br />
* 920,000 points VGA 3.0-inch LCD monitor<br />
* 100,000 cycle shutter</p>
<p>More information can be found at <a href="http://www.photographybay.com/2008/08/21/canon-50d-info-leaked-real-specs/" target="_blank">Photography Bay</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/08/digital-cameras/canon-50d-rumors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon Discounts start today</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/05/news/canon-discounts-start-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/05/news/canon-discounts-start-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 04:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/05/news/canon-discounts-start-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaSome of Canon&#8217;s products have a discount starting today.  Below I&#8217;ve provided a list.  While Canon discounting in the spring is not unusual, it is usually not this high, which leads some to believe that it might be a precursor to a Canon 5D Mark II, as some rumors have suggested.
EOS-5D $300
EOS-40D $200
EF [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block; float: right"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:EOS5D-img_0021-a.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/EOS5D-img_0021-a.jpg/202px-EOS5D-img_0021-a.jpg" alt="Canon EOS 5D" style="border: medium none ; display: block" /></a></span><span style="margin: 1em 0pt 0pt; display: block">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:EOS5D-img_0021-a.jpg" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></span>Some of Canon&#8217;s products have a <a href="http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=NewsDesk_Internal&amp;article_num=051208-3" target="_blank">discount </a>starting today.  Below I&#8217;ve provided a list.  While Canon discounting in the spring is not unusual, it is usually not this high, which leads some to believe that it might be a precursor to a Canon 5D Mark II, as some <a href="http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/04/digital-cameras/digital-slr/canon-5d-rumor/">rumors </a>have suggested.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_5D" title="Canon EOS 5D" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" class="zem_slink">EOS-5D</a> $300<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_40D" title="Canon EOS 40D" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" class="zem_slink">EOS-40D</a> $200<br />
EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM $125<br />
EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM $125<br />
EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM $100<br />
EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM $100<br />
EF 50mm f/1.2L USM $100<br />
EF 35mm f/1.4L USM $100<br />
EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM $75<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EF-S_lens_mount" title="Canon EF-S lens mount" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" class="zem_slink">EF-S</a> 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM $70<br />
EF 17-40mm f/4L USM $50<br />
EF 70-200mm f/4L USM $40<br />
EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro USM $35<br />
EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM $30<br />
EF 28-90mm f/4-5.6 III $15<br />
Speedlite 580 EX II $30<br />
Speedlite 430 EX $15<br />
<fieldset class="zemanta-related" style="margin: 0.5em 0pt 1em; padding: 0pt"><legend class="zemanta-title">Related articles</legend></p>
<ul class="zemanta-article-ul" style="margin: 1em 0pt 1.5em; padding: 0pt">
<li class="zemanta-article" style="margin: 0.5em 2em"><a href="http://gizmodo.com/391194/canon-giving-instant-rebates-up-to-300-on-dslrs-lenses" title="Open in new window" target="_blank">Canon Giving Instant Rebates Up to $300 on DSLRs, Lenses [Dealzmodo]</a></li>
<li class="zemanta-article" style="margin: 0.5em 2em"><a href="http://thomashawk.com/2008/05/if-you-are-going-to-buy-canon-dslr-wait.html" title="Open in new window" target="_blank">If You Are Going to Buy a Canon DSLR, Wait Until Monday</a></li>
</ul>
<p></fieldset></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/05/news/canon-discounts-start-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Canon 5D Mark II Rumor</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/04/digital-cameras/digital-slr/canon-5d-rumor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/04/digital-cameras/digital-slr/canon-5d-rumor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 14:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Digital SLR]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/04/digital-cameras/digital-slr/canon-5d-rumor/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Image via WikipediaRumors are always dangerous to indulge in, however many a Canon user have been waiting for the second version (Mark II) of their 5D camera.
Having has and opportunity to use the first version of the Canon 5D, and enjoying it throughly, an upgrade would almost be  a must purchase for the smaller [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="zemanta-img" style="margin: 1em; display: block; float: right"><a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Canon_5D_img_0047.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/da/Canon_5D_img_0047.jpg/202px-Canon_5D_img_0047.jpg" alt="Canon EOS 5D" style="border: medium none ; display: block" /></a></span><span style="margin: 1em 0pt 0pt; display: block">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Canon_5D_img_0047.jpg" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a></span>Rumors are always dangerous to indulge in, however many a Canon user have been waiting for the second version (Mark II) of their 5D camera.</p>
<p>Having has and opportunity to use the first version of the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_EOS_5D" title="Canon EOS 5D" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" class="zem_slink">Canon 5D</a>, and enjoying it throughly, an upgrade would almost be  a must purchase for the smaller professional photographer or serious hobbyist.</p>
<p>The rumored specs, provided in full below, would allow several key things.</p>
<table border="1" width="75%">
<tr>
<th width="25%">Specification</th>
<th>Why this is cool!</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>15.3 MP full frame CMOS sensor</td>
<td>Larger images allow for larger prints (20&#8243;x30&#8243; not a problem) and allows for better cropping if something was too far away.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Weather sealing same as 1Ds Mark III</td>
<td valign="top">Misty rain, fog, and other elements won&#8217;t ruin your camera.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_speed" title="Film speed" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" class="zem_slink">ISO</a> 12800 (C.F. up to 25600)</td>
<td valign="top">Allows you to shoot in darker areas and still get a good photo.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">All-new 29-point <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Through-the-lens_metering" title="Through-the-lens metering" rel="wikipedia" target="_blank" class="zem_slink">TTL</a> CMOS sensor with 12 cross-type for F/2.8 or faster lens<br />
(35% faster than 40D)</td>
<td valign="top">More CMOS sensors allow for more accurate focusing on your subject.  My only complaint on the original 5D is that is only has 9 focusing points.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">3.0&#8243; LCD (922,000 pixels)</td>
<td valign="top">Bigger LCD screen in the back allows you to see potential problems easier.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Live View</td>
<td valign="top">You can view the image your about to shoot in the LCD screen as well as through the view finder.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">June 2</td>
<td valign="top">We hope.</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p><a href="http://gizmodo.com/367086/canon-5d-mark-ii-rumored-specs-and-details" target="_blank">http://gizmodo.com/367086/canon-5d-mark-ii-rumored-specs-and-details</a></p>
<p id="zemanta-pixie" style="margin: 5px 0pt; width: 100%"><a href="http://www.zemanta.com/" id="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Zemified by Zemanta"><br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/04/digital-cameras/digital-slr/canon-5d-rumor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Using available lights</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/available-light-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/available-light-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 22:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/available-light-photos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the biggest draw backs to shooting a lot of photos, is that the camera&#8217;s flash needs time to recharge to shoot again.  This is one of the reasons I don&#8217;t like to use a flash.  Granted, there are times when one is necessary, but overall I prefer to use the available light.
This means [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest draw backs to <a href="http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/take-lots-of-photos/" title="Shoot a lot of photographs">shooting a lot of photos</a>, is that the camera&#8217;s flash needs time to recharge to shoot again.  This is one of the reasons I don&#8217;t like to use a flash.  Granted, there are times when one is necessary, but overall I prefer to use the available light.</p>
<p>This means I normally have to shoot with a higher speed film (400-800 ISO), a larger f-stop (3.2-5.6 - remember smaller number is actually a larger size), and/or longer shutter speed. However, I get a more natural photo, in my opinion.</p>
<p>Here are some reasons to avoid using a flash is possible:</p>
<ul>
<li>You <strong>draw attention to the camera</strong> so people automatically start to pose. The people around you aren&#8217;t as natural looking as people have been &#8220;trained&#8221; to pose and smile for the camera.</li>
<li>The <strong>artificial white coloring</strong> overwhelms and eliminates the color of the natural lights, reds and oranges in the dawn/dusk, and colored lights of buildings, etc.</li>
<li>It takes time to have the <strong>flash recharge</strong>. Flashes generally cannot shoot numerous times in a row.  They must recharge for anywhere between 2 and 10 seconds before they can set off another full shot.  During this time, a photo worth getting might be missed.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are just my opinions, and I of course also shoot with a Flash when needed. But what about others out there.  Do you like to shoot with a Flash or not? Leave a comment and let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/available-light-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ve got to shoot more - Take Your Camera Everywhere</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/youve-got-to-shoot-more-take-your-camera-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/youve-got-to-shoot-more-take-your-camera-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/youve-got-to-shoot-more-take-your-camera-everywhere/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent article on photography at Digital Photography School gave 5 Reasons to Take Your Camera Everywhere in 2008. A great follow on given the recent post here, you have to shoot more subjects.
I think 3 of their 5 points are right on:

You&#8217;ll end of taking more photos.
You&#8217;ll be more comfortable with your camera.
You&#8217;ll miss [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent article on photography at Digital Photography School gave <a href="http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/5-reasons-to-take-your-camera-everywhere-in-2008/" target="_blank" rel="bookmark">5 Reasons to Take Your Camera Everywhere in 2008</a>. A great follow on given the recent post here, <a href="http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/photograph-more-subjects/">you have to shoot more subjects</a>.</p>
<p>I think 3 of their 5 points are right on:</p>
<ul>
<li>You&#8217;ll end of taking more photos.</li>
<li>You&#8217;ll be more comfortable with your camera.</li>
<li>You&#8217;ll miss less of <em>those </em>moments.</li>
</ul>
<p>The other two, you&#8217;ll have to work on yourself. But with time, and the ability to experiment (which you can&#8217;t do if you don&#8217;t have your camera) you&#8217;ll get those as well.</p>
<p>Take a look at their article, and start shooting more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/youve-got-to-shoot-more-take-your-camera-everywhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You&#8217;ve got to shoot more - part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/photograph-more-subjects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/photograph-more-subjects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 06:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/photograph-more-subjects/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the previous tip I mentioned how you need to take more than one photo of any given subject.
In addition to that, you have to learn to shoot more often. On a recent trip out with my family, I started looking for things I wouldn&#8217;t normally take photos of.  I started to feel &#8220;uncomfortable&#8221; with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the <a href="http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/take-lots-of-photos/" title="You've got to shoot alot to be good">previous tip</a> I mentioned how you need to take more than one photo of any given subject.</p>
<p>In addition to that, you have to learn to shoot more often. On a recent trip out with my family, I started looking for things I wouldn&#8217;t normally take photos of.  I started to feel &#8220;uncomfortable&#8221; with what I was photographing. At first, taking photos of walls, and other textures felt odd.  However, as time progressed, it felt better and when we got back to review the photos, we had some nice shots.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean we didn&#8217;t delete a bunch either - but it did allow us to keep some we wouldn&#8217;t normally get.</p>
<p>While many people out for a day will shoot 30-40 photos, my wife and I shoot over 500 that day.  Why, we just followed the two rules given:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Shoot multiple shots</strong> - it saved us with our kids which are always moving</li>
<li><strong>Shoot more things</strong> - it expands your comfort zone and gets you looking in ways you wouldn&#8217;t expect - which leads to that nice shot you would have missed.</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;ll be posting some of the photos we took the other day in an upcoming tutorial on shooting moving water.  Look for it next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/photograph-more-subjects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo Tip: Shoot a lot&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/take-lots-of-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/take-lots-of-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2008 04:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/take-lots-of-photos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wanted to know how professional photographers always had all of these great shots. The tip was that we never saw the bad ones, even though there were always some. The first tip I learned from a professional photographer is that you&#8217;ve got to shoot a lot. Does that mean going around and photographing everything? [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to know how professional photographers always had all of these great shots. The tip was that we never saw the bad ones, even though there were always some. The <em>first </em>tip I learned from a professional photographer is that you&#8217;ve got to shoot a lot. Does that mean going around and photographing everything? No! What it means, and I had a chance to see in action, was he didn&#8217;t get 1 shot of something, he got several.</p>
<p>In a post by <a href="http://scobleizer.com/" target="_blank">Robert Scoble</a>, on <a href="http://scobleizer.com/2007/11/20/photowalking-with-a-professional/" target="_blank">photo walking with a professional</a>  he talks about a photographer shooting 44 rolls at a basketball game.  (That&#8217;s 1056 photos if using 24 exposure rolls.)  Of all of those shots only 1 was published. But taking that many allowed for that one to be used.  If the photographer had decided to not take the shot to save some money, none might have been published.</p>
<p>So here is why its important to take a lot of photos.</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>People and Animals are always moving</strong>&#8230;don&#8217;t miss a good shot because someone is blinked, looked at their kid, etc.</li>
<li><strong>Auto focus may not be your  friend</strong>, so move a bit during your shots o make sure you didn&#8217;t focus on the flowers in front of the person.</li>
<li>If you <strong>shoot the same thing from several slightly different angles</strong>. You will  find one you like better, I can almost guarantee it.</li>
<li>It allows you to <strong>throw out the bad one</strong>(s) (when someone bumped into you, you pushed too hard and blurred the shot, etc)</li>
</ul>
<p>The last one is the best point. When I had to shoot on film, I took my photos to a local place the bought back the photos I didn&#8217;t like.  I spent a lot on film, but saved on some of the developing.  It was the only way I could afford it, and I still didn&#8217;t shoot as much as I wanted to.  Now that I shoot all digital I routinely throw out 1/2 to 2/3 of the photos I take.  Why, as cheap as a digital shot is, I&#8217;ll shoot tons of photos.  Both storage cards for the camera is cheap, as are hard drives to store them on.  We only print a tenth of what we keep.</p>
<p>On a recent vacation, my wife and I shot over 2300 photos in 5 days.  We narrowed it down to 1100. People marveled at how I had all of these great photos&#8230;but they never questioned the number I deleted because there were so many, I couldn&#8217;t have deleted any could I have?</p>
<p>In wedding photography of old,  if you shot 120-150 shots total it was a lot.  Now many wedding photographers will shoot 200+, and I&#8217;ve shot 400+ in just a few hours at a wedding. When we given the bride her final photos to pick from, she never has to see a bad shot, and still gets 150+, every time. She never asks if we have more, because we can give her so many good ones.</p>
<p>So shoot a bunch, and throw out the bad ones, and let people marvel at how you never have a bad shot in your thousands of photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2008/01/photo-tips/take-lots-of-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Welcome to Simple Photo Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2007/12/photo-tips/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2007/12/photo-tips/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Walter Wimberly</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Photo Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Simple Photo Tips will try to offer some simple photo taking suggestions that will help any one get better photos.
To goal is to do so, without you spending a lot of money on fancy equipment, or forcing you to understand weird physics forumals. The topics we will cover include:

Framing your shot,
Lighting your photo area,
Displaying your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simple Photo Tips will try to offer some simple photo taking suggestions that will help any one get better photos.</p>
<p>To goal is to do so, without you spending a lot of money on fancy equipment, or forcing you to understand weird physics forumals. The topics we will cover include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Framing your shot,</li>
<li>Lighting your photo area,</li>
<li>Displaying your work,</li>
<li>Using the camera you have, and</li>
<li>more&#8230;</li>
</ul>
<p>We know we don&#8217;t have all of the answers, so if you have a suggestion, please feel free to drop us a line so we can add your suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.simple-photo-tips.com/blog/2007/12/photo-tips/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
